Publication:
Why do we not need ct in patients who undergo type i tympanoplasty?

dc.contributor.buuauthorDEMİR, UYGAR LEVENT
dc.contributor.buuauthorDemir, Uygar Levent
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkyıldız, Metin Yüksel
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇetin, Yaser Said
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoğlu, Fikret
dc.contributor.buuauthorKASAPOĞLU, FİKRET
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentKulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7684-4600
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-3877-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridGQR-1089-2022
dc.contributor.researcheridAAC-8563-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T13:01:30Z
dc.date.available2024-09-23T13:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has gained wide acceptance in diagnostic work- up of suppurative chronic otitis media. Most ear surgeons order HRCT to make a rational operative plan, especially in the presence of symptoms, such as refractory otorrhea with bad odor, epithelial debris at retraction pockets, and defects in bony walls of the middle ear. The aim of this study was to show the lack of necessity of preoperative HRCT by evaluating its predictive value in patients who underwent type I tympanoplasty.Methods: The study included a patient group who underwent tympanoplasty with dry perforation and normal middle ear mucosa. The intraoperative findings of 43 patients were compared with preoperative HRCT and audiogram findings.Results: There was no significance between preoperative air conduction threshold and existence of ossicular erosion in HRCT. HRCT incorrectly predicted the presence of cholesteatoma in two patients. The positive predictive value of HRCT in detecting soft or granulation tissue was 4/14 (28.57%). The sensitivity and specificity of HRCT in the diagnosis of ossicular chain status were 9.09% and 90.62%, respectively.Conclusion: HRCT plays an important role in the assessment of patients with suppurative chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma. However, preoperative HRCT in patients who have undergone type I tympanoplasty is not necessary. It has no benefit and also leads patients to unnecessary radiation exposure.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tao.2014.698
dc.identifier.endpage80
dc.identifier.issn2667-7466
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage77
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2014.698
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/45072
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.identifier.wos000421056400001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Yayincilik
dc.relation.journalTurkish Archives Of Otorhinolaryngology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSuppurative otitis media
dc.subjectTympanoplasty
dc.subjectComputed tomography
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
dc.titleWhy do we not need ct in patients who undergo type i tympanoplasty?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa6f4de0e-11ee-445b-93cd-4e9efb21b490
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcfa6b56d-ac29-4916-8f7c-c5e51b793f11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycfa6b56d-ac29-4916-8f7c-c5e51b793f11

Files