Publication:
Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorGüçlü, Zekiye Begüm
dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorGökay, Gonca Deste
dc.contributor.authorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.contributor.authorOyar, Perihan
dc.contributor.buuauthorDESTE GÖKAY, GONCA
dc.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentProtetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5481-0063
dc.contributor.researcheridAAM-7219-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-08T05:31:16Z
dc.date.available2024-11-08T05:31:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-17
dc.description.abstractThis study's purpose is to assess the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and prosthetic framework using two different posterior implant angles. All-on-four maxillary prostheses fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic-ceramic-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were designed with 17 or 30-degree-angled posterior implants. Posterior cantilever and frontal vertical loads were applied to all models. The distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses (sigma max and sigma min) and von Mises stress (sigma VM) was evaluated. Under posterior cantilever load, with an increase in posterior implant angle, sigma max decreased by 4 and 7 MPa in the cortical bone when ZLS and CoCr were used as a prosthetic framework, respectively. Regardless of the framework material, 17-degree-angled posterior implants showed the highest sigma VM (541.36 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 110.79 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Regardless of the posterior implant angle, ZLS framework showed the highest sigma VM (91.59 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 218.99 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Increasing implant angle from 17 to 30 degrees caused a decrease in sigma max values in the cortical bone. Designs with 30-degree posterior implant angles and ZLS framework material may be preferred in All-on-four implant-supported fixed complete dentures.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/bmt-2022-0176
dc.identifier.eissn1862-278X
dc.identifier.endpage428
dc.identifier.issn0013-5585
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage419
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0176
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0176/html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/47595
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.identifier.wos000840878600001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter Gmbh
dc.relation.journalBiomedical Engineering-biomedizinische Technik
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectStress-distribution
dc.subjectSuperstructure materials
dc.subjectCantilever length
dc.subjectBone
dc.subjectInclination
dc.subjectPatterns
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectFatigue
dc.subjectMisfit
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectImplants
dc.subjectProstheses
dc.subjectStress and strain distribution
dc.subjectTilted implants
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectEngineering, biomedical
dc.subjectMedical informatics
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleMechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi/Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublication445cb9ac-17e5-4716-8945-a46301346983
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery445cb9ac-17e5-4716-8945-a46301346983

Files