Publication:
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorGüçlü, Zekiye Begüm
dc.contributor.authorGökay, Gonca Deste
dc.contributor.authorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.contributor.buuauthorDESTE GÖKAY, GONCA
dc.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentProtetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridAAM-7219-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T11:25:09Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T11:25:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-20
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in All-on-4 implant-supported fixed maxillary prostheses with three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The model of complete edentulous maxilla was created using the Rhinoceros and VRMesh Studio programs. Anterior vertical and 17 degrees- and 30 degrees-angled posterior implants were positioned with All-on-4 design. Straigth and angled multi-unit abutments scanned using a 3D scanner. Two different prosthetic superstructures (monolithic zirconia framework and lithium disilicate veneer (ZL) and monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) were modeled. Four models designed according to the prosthetic structure and posterior implant angles. Posterior vertical bilateral loading and frontal oblique loading was performed. The principal stresses (bone tissues-Pmax and Pmin) and von Mises equivalent stresses (implant and prosthetic structures) were analyzed. In all models, the highest Pmax stress values were calculated under posterior bilateral loading in cortical bone. The highest von Mises stress levels occured in the posterior implants under posterior bilateral load (260.33 and 219.50 MPa) in the ZL-17 and ZL-30 models, respectively. Under both loads, higher stress levels in prosthetic structures were shown in the ZLS models compared with ZL models. There was no difference between posterior implant angles on stress distribution occurred in implant material and alveolar bone tissue. ZLS and ZL prosthetic structures can be reliably used in maxillary All-on-4 rehabilitation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/bmt-2022-0109
dc.identifier.endpage315
dc.identifier.issn0013-5585
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage307
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0109
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0109/html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/47826
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.identifier.wos000797637200001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter De Gruyter Gmbh
dc.relation.journalBiomedical Engineering-Biomedizinische Technik
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectStress-distribution
dc.subjectSuperstructure material
dc.subjectMonolithic zirconia
dc.subjectArch prostheses
dc.subjectVertical misfit
dc.subjectBone
dc.subjectInclinations
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectGeometry
dc.subjectTitanium
dc.subjectComputer simulation
dc.subjectDental prosthesis
dc.subjectDental stress analysis
dc.subjectImplant-supported
dc.subjectZirconia
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMedical informatics
dc.titleBiomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi/Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublication445cb9ac-17e5-4716-8945-a46301346983
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery445cb9ac-17e5-4716-8945-a46301346983

Files