Publication:
Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy

dc.contributor.authorÇevik, Sadık Görkem
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Rahmi
dc.contributor.authorÇevik, Mediha Tok
dc.contributor.authorKıvanç, Serta Argun
dc.contributor.authorAkova-Budak, Berna
dc.contributor.authorPerente, İrfan
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Reşat
dc.contributor.buuauthorKıvanç, Serta Argun
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkova-Budak, Berna
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGöz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0995-5260
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-6518-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridABE-3033-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T11:28:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T11:28:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-20
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of healthy individuals obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM).Method: In total, 148 eyes of 74 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in the study. Central corneal thickness measurements of all patients performed with UP and NCCM were compared.Results: A total of 74 subjects (38 females) were included in this study. The mean age was 45.2 +/- 18.4 (range 12-85) years. The mean central corneal thickness of all 148 eyes was 546.9 +/- 40 mu m with UP and 510.8 +/- 42 mu m with NCSM. The mean central corneal thickness measured with NCSM was 35 mu m thinner than that measured with UP (p < 0.001). A high degree of agreement was found between the two methods (r = 0.942, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Our results suggest that NCSM measures thinner corneas than UP and that the correction formula we identified should be applied when comparing between these two devices.
dc.identifier.doi10.5935/0004-2749.20160089
dc.identifier.endpage314
dc.identifier.issn0004-2749
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009812482
dc.identifier.startpage312
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20160089
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scielo.br/j/abo/a/5swBLrYjRTkXsqXLBZwWtzs/?lang=en&format=pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43983
dc.identifier.volume79
dc.identifier.wos000391431500008
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherConsel Brasil Oftalmologia
dc.relation.journalArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomography
dc.subjectRepeatability
dc.subjectPentacam
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.subjectOrbscan
dc.subjectCornea/pathology
dc.subjectCorneal pachymetry
dc.subjectMicroscopy/methods
dc.subjectCornea/anatomy & histology
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.titleComparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kivanc_vd_2016.pdf
Size:
340.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format