Publication:
Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones using holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser devices: 15 W vs 30 W

dc.contributor.buuauthorKAYGISIZ, ONUR
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇİÇEK, MEHMET ÇAĞATAY
dc.contributor.buuauthorYENİ, SEZGİN
dc.contributor.buuauthorYeni, Sezgin
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇicek, Mehmet Çağatay
dc.contributor.buuauthorCoşkun, Burhan
dc.contributor.buuauthorCOŞKUN, BURHAN
dc.contributor.buuauthorKılıçarslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.buuauthorKILIÇARSLAN, HAKAN
dc.contributor.buuauthorTuran, Levent
dc.contributor.buuauthorTURAN, LEVENT
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentÜroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9790-7295
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5143-6507
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0471-5404
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8242-9921
dc.contributor.researcheridL-9439-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9704-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridJCO-5169-2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T11:51:49Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T11:51:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-07
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of 15- and 30-W holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser devices used in the treatment of pediatric kidney stones.Methods: Eighty-six consecutive pediatric patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) between February 2010 and August 2020 were enrolled in the study. After exclusion criteria were applied, the data of 79 children were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to the laser device power of 15 W (Group 15: N = 30) and 30 W (Group 30: N = 49). The groups were compared according to demographic characteristics, stone feature, and clinical efficacy.Results: The age, gender, height, weight, and stone characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean operation time was shorter in Group 30. The stone-free rate after the first RIRS session (SF1) was 66.7% in Group 15 and 83.3% in Group 30. The SF1 for 20-mm or larger kidney stones was found to be 0% in Group 15 and 62.5% in Group 30. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate.Conclusions: In pediatric kidney stone treatment, 30-W Ho:YAG laser devices should be preferred as they shorten the operation time compared with 15-W devices and provide the final stone-free status with fewer procedures, especially in large kidney stones.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2021.0922
dc.identifier.endpage920
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage916
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0922
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/45149
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wos000770444600001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Endourology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRenal stones
dc.subjectFlow
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectKidney calculi
dc.subjectLaser lithotripsy
dc.subjectLaser power
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectUrology & nephrology
dc.titleUreterorenoscopic lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones using holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser devices: 15 W vs 30 W
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc7166d91-f1a2-4296-b6cf-6666152225e0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication27ed7a6c-fea4-4bfd-8cde-4506947b3fe8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7c4a68a5-1acc-4fc7-877a-59b23dc62d26
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7e53dfda-90d9-48ee-acf2-c05fb2b33a29
relation.isAuthorOfPublication97a09c20-e30a-413a-8e4b-2e773b1beb77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4513f8b8-01ac-4c28-943f-1e44efe9df82
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery27ed7a6c-fea4-4bfd-8cde-4506947b3fe8

Files